<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lens &#8211; snap snap, grin grin &#8230; say no more</title>
	<atom:link href="https://twyles.co.uk/tag/lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://twyles.co.uk</link>
	<description>A nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2019 19:09:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Pancake Day</title>
		<link>https://twyles.co.uk/pancake-day/</link>
					<comments>https://twyles.co.uk/pancake-day/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 22:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40 mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pancake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sean tucker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve schapiro]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twyles.co.uk/?p=217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Canon 5D, 40 mm, ISO 800, 1/60 sec @ f/5.6 A while back I was caught a wonderful documentary on Sky Arts about Steve Schapiro. Whilst watching I noticed he always (obviously!) had a camera with him and I started wondering why that wasn&#8217;t the case with me. I soon realised it was because physically [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="envira-gallery-feed-output"><img decoding="async" class="envira-gallery-feed-image" tabindex="0" src="https://twyles.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/squealer_and_peeper.jpg" title="Squealer &amp; Peeper" alt="Squealer &amp; Peeper" /></div>
<p>Canon 5D, 40 mm, ISO 800, 1/60 sec @ f/5.6</p>
<p>A while back I was caught a wonderful documentary on Sky Arts about <a href="http://steveschapiro.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Steve Schapiro</a>. Whilst watching I noticed he always (obviously!) had a camera with him and I started wondering why that wasn&#8217;t the case with me. I soon realised it was because physically the smallest lens I have is the not insignificant <a href="http://www.canon.co.uk/lenses/ef-100mm-f-2-8l-macro-is-usm-lens/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Canon EF 100 mm f/2.8L Macro USM</a>. Sorted! I clearly needed a small lens!</p>
<p>The question then was what focal length. I have a <a href="http://www.canon.co.uk/lenses/ef-17-40mm-f-4l-usm-lens/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Canon EF&nbsp;f/4L 17-40 mm</a> that is great for landscapes on the full-frame 5D. I thought about a 24 mm but would that be flexible enough for all forms of photography? My lenses are the aforementioned 17-40 mm and a <a href="http://www.canon.co.uk/lenses/ef-70-200mm-f-2-8l-is-ii-usm-lens/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Canon EF 70-200 mm f2.8/L IS USM</a> along with the 100 mm macro. I also have a 2x convertor for the 70-200 zoom so I&#8217;m covering most bases. If I were to get a fixed focal length lens I need to know it&#8217;s going to be useful in most situations.</p>
<p>The choices seemed to be within the range 24-50 mm. That&#8217;s some choice and needed to do some research. I really fancied the wider angle as it would suit my style of photography&#8230;</p>
<p>Another consideration this time was the cost of the lens. I hadn&#8217;t scrimped on costs before but I couldn&#8217;t justify dropping a lot of cash on something I might not enjoy using.</p>
<p>It seemed the sweet spot at the intersection of price, usability, image quality and physical size was the <a href="http://www.canon.co.uk/lenses/ef-40mm-f-2-8-stm-lens/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Canon EF 40 mm f/2.8 STM</a> pancake lens so that&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve gone for. It&#8217;s funny how different the 5D looks with such a small lens &#8211; almost like a toy camera. I&#8217;m looking forward to taking the camera with me more and trying out some new techniques. I&#8217;ve got a trip to Istanbul coming up at the end of June and I have decided that this will be the only lens that I take with me.</p>
<p>During the course of my research I was pleased to find Sean Tucker&#8217;s <a href="http://www.seantucker.photography" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>. It&#8217;s a great site with some great images and even more amazingly some good tips and knowledge sharing from a professional who takes pride in helping others improve their craft. In his blog, Sean sets himself a challenge to use a series of single focal length lenses. Included were <a href="http://www.seantucker.photography/blog/2013/06/24mm-focal-length-series.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">24</a>, <a href="http://www.seantucker.photography/blog/2013/05/35mm-focal-length-series.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">35</a> and <a href="http://www.seantucker.photography/blog/2013/06/50mm-focal-length-series.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">50</a> mm lenses. It was good to read his experiences particularly with the 24 mm as that was my original preferred choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://twyles.co.uk/pancake-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
